does analog photography result in a better "hit rate"? i feel like with digital just about 80% of everything i take is a reject (i suspect that's due to me not wanting to edit much though..)
don't think it'll be a factor that gets me into analog, just curious mostly
the more i look at them, the more it feels like most of the pictures i got yesterday are landscape photoslop
like, yep, it's a mountain, with pine trees, and there's pine trees in the foreground couple here and there are ok, mostly cause there's infrastructure going on in them, roads and such
decently pleased with the flowers and moss though. the few in focus birds are ok, but i had the wrong lens on for that and didn't want to switch as there weren't too many of them
it's really difficult to capture the mood of a gentle snowfall in pictures.. especially during the day i think i think a little longer of an exposure might help but by that point you're cranking the aperture so far that you don't get many out of focus spots, quite the balancing act
it's a difficult thing to do right, kudos to those photographers that do
